


Management mandate or advisory mandate, what are the differences?
Management mandate or advisory mandate, what are the differences?
"I want to invest, but I don't know where to start…"
This is a phrase I often hear from Swiss executives and independents, aged between 30 and 55, who want to grow their wealth without necessarily becoming finance experts.
Two main options are available to you: the management mandate and the advisory mandate. But what is the difference between these two approaches? And above all, which one is better suited to your situation?
Understanding the two approaches

Management mandate: delegate with complete confidence
With a management mandate, you entrust the management of your portfolio to professionals. They make investment decisions based on your risk profile, your goals, and your investment horizon.
Advantages:
Time-saving: you don't have to monitor the markets daily.
Professional expertise: your portfolio is managed by specialists.
Regular follow-up: adjustments are made based on market developments.
Disadvantages:
Less control: you delegate investment decisions.
Potentially higher costs: management fees may be higher than those of an advisory mandate.
Advisory mandate: remain active in your investments
The advisory mandate allows you to benefit from personalized recommendations while retaining final control over investment decisions.
Advantages:
Personal involvement: you actively participate in the management of your portfolio.
Tailored support: you receive advice suited to your situation.
Flexibility: you can adjust your strategy based on your preferences.
Disadvantages:
Requires time: you must follow the recommendations and make decisions.
Increased responsibility: performance partly depends on your choices.
How to choose between the two?
The choice between a management mandate and an advisory mandate depends on several factors:
Available time: if you lack time, the management mandate may be more suitable.
Financial knowledge: if you have investment knowledge, the advisory mandate may suit you.
Desired level of involvement: do you wish to delegate or be active in your investments?
Budget: associated fees may vary between the two options.
Conclusion
Investing is an important step in securing your financial future. Whether you choose a management mandate or an advisory mandate, the key is to select the approach that best fits your profile, your goals, and your lifestyle.
Do not hesitate to consult a wealth management advisor to assist you in this process and make the most informed choice.
"I want to invest, but I don't know where to start…"
This is a phrase I often hear from Swiss executives and independents, aged between 30 and 55, who want to grow their wealth without necessarily becoming finance experts.
Two main options are available to you: the management mandate and the advisory mandate. But what is the difference between these two approaches? And above all, which one is better suited to your situation?
Understanding the two approaches

Management mandate: delegate with complete confidence
With a management mandate, you entrust the management of your portfolio to professionals. They make investment decisions based on your risk profile, your goals, and your investment horizon.
Advantages:
Time-saving: you don't have to monitor the markets daily.
Professional expertise: your portfolio is managed by specialists.
Regular follow-up: adjustments are made based on market developments.
Disadvantages:
Less control: you delegate investment decisions.
Potentially higher costs: management fees may be higher than those of an advisory mandate.
Advisory mandate: remain active in your investments
The advisory mandate allows you to benefit from personalized recommendations while retaining final control over investment decisions.
Advantages:
Personal involvement: you actively participate in the management of your portfolio.
Tailored support: you receive advice suited to your situation.
Flexibility: you can adjust your strategy based on your preferences.
Disadvantages:
Requires time: you must follow the recommendations and make decisions.
Increased responsibility: performance partly depends on your choices.
How to choose between the two?
The choice between a management mandate and an advisory mandate depends on several factors:
Available time: if you lack time, the management mandate may be more suitable.
Financial knowledge: if you have investment knowledge, the advisory mandate may suit you.
Desired level of involvement: do you wish to delegate or be active in your investments?
Budget: associated fees may vary between the two options.
Conclusion
Investing is an important step in securing your financial future. Whether you choose a management mandate or an advisory mandate, the key is to select the approach that best fits your profile, your goals, and your lifestyle.
Do not hesitate to consult a wealth management advisor to assist you in this process and make the most informed choice.
Need an outside perspective on your situation?
Our team answers your questions for free.
Need an outside perspective on your situation?
Our team answers your questions for free.
Need an outside perspective on your situation?
Our team answers your questions for free.
International Center Cointrin
Route de Pré-Bois 20, CP 228,
1215 Geneva, Switzerland
+41 (0)78 327 46 28
Our Expertise
Free yourself.
© 2025 RidgeRock Partners. All rights reserved.
© 2025 RidgeRock Partners. All rights reserved.
International Center Cointrin
Route de Pré-Bois 20, CP 228,
1215 Geneva, Switzerland
+41 (0)78 327 46 28
Our Expertise
Free yourself.
© 2025 RidgeRock Partners. All rights reserved.
International Center Cointrin
Route de Pré-Bois 20, CP 228,
1215 Geneva, Switzerland
+41 (0)78 327 46 28
Our Expertise
Free yourself.
© 2025 RidgeRock Partners. All rights reserved.